Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Magnum Primer with Unique in 357?

  1. #1
    GunLoad Trainee
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    23

    Default Magnum Primer with Unique in 357?

    I bought some Gold Dot 125 gr hp and loaded them with 9.2 gr of unique for use in my SS 4" Ruger GP-100 .357. This is from Speer's load data (max load 9.6 gr). I used magnum primers because that's all I had on hand. Speer's load data shows magnum primers with 296, h110, hs-7, & hs-6, but not with Unique. I found a load from Sierra for same bullet weight that did use magnum primers. Sierra's max load is 9.3 gr of Unique. Is this a safe load with magnum primers?

  2. #2
    Dogs Like Him versifier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Yes, it's safe. It is a pretty hot load, but I wouldn't worry about it a bit. That is a really strong design. My S&W handles the max loads with no problem, though they are not the most accurate - 9.0 is the load I use. Max used to be 10.0 until they started to measure pressure data in PSI instead of CUP, Sierra now lists it at 9.3 for their bullets. Just for future reference, pressure signs in a revolver include flattened primers and difficult extraction, but if there is too much oil/protectant in the chambers it may get sticky, too, without being overpressure. I use mag primers in all my .357 loads for better ignition, it was the first case I ever loaded for (with Unique & CCI SPM primers) 35 years ago. Worked great then, still works great, though now I shoot nothing but cast out of them. As long as you work up to max loads one step at a time and watch the primers like you would with a rifle, you will have no problems. Caution is good.
    "Stand your ground.
    Do not fire unless fired upon.
    But if they mean to have a war let it begin here."
    - Capt. Parker, Lexington Militia, April 19, 1775

  3. #3
    GunLoad Trainee
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Thanks Versifier, I was waiting for some responses before I head to the range. I would have liked a slightly lower charge, but my Lee auto-disk pro seems to have picked this one for me. It's difficult to get Unique to flow well in my set up. I'm considering trying 296 because I've heard it flows better in the Lee auto-disk.

  4. #4
    runfiverun runfiverun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs idaho
    Posts
    657

    Default

    296 is a ball type powder it will drop a more consistent "load"
    drop after drop.
    but you use a different disc to get the velocities you are now

  5. #5
    Dogs Like Him versifier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Yes, those are the drawbacks of the Lee measure. They lack charge versatility and have "attitudes" with certain flake and extruded powders. Ball powders do work a little better in them, but again you have to go with whatever volumes of those it allows you. Before you go out and get some 296, there are smaller PPM cavities that will give a lighter charges that still falls within the working range of Unique (7.6-9.3gr). There should be a set of charge tables that came with it, but I have a copy in my Lee manual. The .88 or .95 cavities should do it.
    Cavity/Charge Weight of Unique
    .82...............7.5
    .88...............8.1
    .95...............8.7
    1.02.............9.3
    Ironically, the cheaper Perfect Powder Measure is completely adjustable, but I much prefer conventional models by Lyman, RCBS, Redding, Dillon, etc. They're a lot more rugged and will stand up well through many years of frequent use, and I use a lot of Alliant and IMR powders. For now, you have what you have. Later, you may decide to upgrade. A set of Lee dippers cost less than $10 and might be an option, too.
    "Stand your ground.
    Do not fire unless fired upon.
    But if they mean to have a war let it begin here."
    - Capt. Parker, Lexington Militia, April 19, 1775

  6. #6

    Default

    The Lee adjustable disc will solve your problem easily. I like it in my loadmaster press as I change boolit weights regularly, and the recorded settings repeat easily and dependably. Dale

  7. #7
    Gunload Grunt kg42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    510

    Default

    I finally listened to the advice given by some on the internet about American flake powders:
    1: I removed my home made baffle,
    2: I fill the (pro) hoppers of my Auto Disks at least 50%.

    I haven't taken the time to weight the resultant regularity, but I am now very happy with 4.4gr of 700X in 45ACP.
    I had to postpone the 9 Luger test (3.4gr) as the range's floor was littered with 9mm brass, but I certainly didn't catch half loads like usual.

    kg
    Last edited by kg42; 02-07-2008 at 12:34 AM.

  8. #8
    GunLoad Trainee
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Just an update. I went the range Saturday and the 9.2 gr of Unique did fine with the mag primers. FELT like the Remington sjhp UMC loads that I use to pay $40/box for before I began reloading. Thanks for the advice guys.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check        

Gunloads.com Sponsored Links