Printable View
Hey gang-
I recently found some old stock, (cardboard cannister) H4831 on a deal. While I still see it listed, a lot of my manuals have the SC data only listed. Are the two powders alike enough, (with the exception of kernel length), to interchange the load data? I am cautious enough to start low & work up, just wondering if I'd be starting low enough. Thanks in advance.
-Klaus
They are as close to identical as you can get. So my Chrony tells me.
Ken
For me they are so close to identical, I have used them interchangably. I have even mixed the end of a jar of 4831 with a 1/2 jar of 4831sc .
The rounds loaded from that mix shot with no differance in target groups or aiming point.
Just my 2 cents. :)
Thanks guys, you confirmed what I had suspected. It is always nice to get more than one opinion though. Take care
-Klaus
Be aware that between lots of any powder there can be slight differences, otherwise, they are the same. A powder company would never market powders with diffent characteristics under the same number because they'd be overwhelmed with lawsuits. They all are very careful to pay attention to this.
As a matter of intrest here is the ADI equivilent (Australian Defense Industries ) powders made here in Australia & marketed in the US by Hogdon powders
Ie Hogdon data can be used for ADI powders & visa versa ! This will probarly be of more use to Aussie shooters as we can only readily obtain ADI or winchester powders these days (though I have a sourse for IMR but it's not constant )
ADI AR2206H = H4895
AR2208 = Varget
AR2209 = H4350
AR2213SC = H4831
AR2217 =H1000
AR2219 =H322
AR2225 =Retumbo
Dave
H4831 shows some of the lowest extreme spreads in my guns. Gianni